OpenVLAN vs OpenVPN

The classic open-source VPN versus an identity-based AmneziaWG network. One changed the world in 2001; networking has since moved.

Side by side

OpenVLANOpenVPN
ProtocolAmneziaWG (~4k lines, kernel speed)TLS-based (mature, heavier)
TopologyMesh, peer-to-peerHub-and-spoke via server
Config per peerLogin once, managed.ovpn profiles + certs
Certificate lifecycleInvisible, automaticeasy-rsa or your PKI
PerformanceKernel-line-rate, low latencyUserspace overhead
Reconnect on network changeInstant roamingNoticeable renegotiation
Access controlPer-user ACLs + postureCCD files + firewall rules

Where each wins

Choose OpenVPN when…

You need deeply customized TLS setups, TCP/444 fallback everywhere, or have existing OpenVPN expertise and configs that work.

Choose OpenVLAN when…

You want roaming devices, per-user access rules, and no server to babysit — the standard modern case.

Migration note

Running OpenVPN today? Our switch guide covers the parallel-run pattern: join both networks, move users by group, retire the server when the graph empties.

The 2001 stack was great. This is 2026.